Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Robbie_McClintock
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<h4>Hello,</h4>
<h4>Hello,</h4>


<p>I'm Robbie McClintock, a retired professor working to further <i>the digital campus</i>, an important emergent transformation in higher education. By <i>digital campus</i>, I'm not referring to distance learning or how on campus courses use innformation technologies. It's a place in cyberspace co-existing with the physical campus familiar in higher education. It's not  computersactivities characteristic of higher education and academic life.</p>
<p>I'm Robbie McClintock, a retired professor working to further <i>the digital campus</i>, an important emergent transformation in higher education. By <i>digital campus</i>, I'm not referring only to distance learning or to how campus courses use information technologies. It's situated at dot-edu, an emerging place in cyberspace, co-existing with the physical campus, where people engaging with an academic institution are becoming able to do all the activities they want and need to do. I'm working to advance that development because I believe it can become a transformative development for the betterment of all.</p>


<p>That purpose brings me to the business at hand: not to tell all that I think about the digital campus as an ideal type, but to say a bit about my intellectual life leading me to become interested in it. I'm old, born in New York New York, a child of depression yuppies — dad, investment banking, & mom, dress design, to the age of 3 I was as a minor prince in Gramercy Park. I was then moved, to my delight, to a small farm in eastern Pennsylvania, where I enjoyed a Rousseauian childhood, looslely overseen while my parents commuted to their work. At 8, I began to shuffle between country and city beginning my formal education in elite schools — Buckley, Deerfield, Princeton (BA '61), and Columbia (PhD '68).</p>
<p>That purpose brings me to the business at hand: not to tell all that I think about the digital campus, but to say a bit about my experience that has led to my interest in it. I'm old, born 1939 in Manhattan, a child of depression yuppies — dad, investment banking, & mom, dress design. To the age of 3, I was a minor prince in Gramercy Park. Then I was moved, to my delight, to a small farm in eastern Pennsylvania, where I enjoyed a Rousseauian childhood. While my parents commuted to their work, I was looslely overseen with animals to tend, fences to mend, vegetables to grow, and a large wood to explore with a shallow stream in its middle leading home. At 8, youth began as the family together started to shuffle between farm and city, enabling me to shore up my formal education in elite schools — Buckley, Deerfield, Princeton (BA '61), and Columbia (PhD '68).</p>


<p>In retrospect, all that went quickly. As an only child of older parents, I spent much time alone among adults, acquiring an ease inspeaking with them, observant of both insights and imitations, forming my own views in a thoughtful reserve. I was cognizant of my own ignorance, and that of others, and without much alienation, I would fit in in many situations while rarely feeling a sense of belonging.</p>
<p>In retrospect, all that went quickly. As an only child of older parents, I spent much time alone among adults, acquiring an ease inspeaking with them, observant of both insights and imitations, forming my own views in a thoughtful reserve. I was cognizant of my own ignorance, and that of others, and without much alienation, I would fit in in many situations while rarely feeling a sense of belonging.</p>


<p>In school, I preferred sports to academics, doing just well enough on the scholastic escalator to keep advancing on the path I believed to be my choice. I had a strong sense of my own ignorances and was relatively adept at covering them up and I advanced on grounds of achieved excellence but thanks to generally perceived promise. I didn't hold mastery of conventional learning in much esteem, wanting instead to tackle the actual, intractable problems. As I matured, it came together in a knack for thinking out of the box while finding a good place within the box.</p>
<p>In school, I preferred sports to academics, doing just well enough on the scholastic escalator to keep advancing on the path I believed to be my choice. I had a strong sense of my ignorance and the curiosity that came with it. I was relatively adept at covering up what I did not know, and I advanced, not on grounds of achieved excellence, but thanks to perceptions of having strong promise. I didn't hold mastery of conventional learning in much esteem, wanting instead to tackle actual, intractable problems. As I matured, it came together in a knack for thinkin-out-of-the-box while finding a good place within the box.</p>


<p>Hence, through my formal education, I was poor at assigned learning, but ardent in independent study, in the classical sense — striving after, concentrating on, favoring, applying oneself, giving attention to, being eager, zealous, taking pains, diligent, devoted to. With the bookstore as my curriculum, I studied my way through Princeton, sparked by avid reading in the work of the Spanish thinker, José Ortega y Gasset. At first, my grades were awful, and then not good, until in my senior year I aced comprehensives and wrote an excellent senior thesis, graduating with high honors and a prize for most improvement from the Woodrow Wilson School, my major.</p>
<p>Hence, through my formal education, I was poor at assigned learning, but ardent in self-directed study, in the classical sense — striving after, concentrating on, favoring, applying myself, giving attention to, being eager, zealous, taking pains, diligent, devoted to. With the bookstore as my curriculum, I studied my way through Princeton, sparked by avid reading in the work of the Spanish thinker, José Ortega y Gasset. At first, I flirted with flunking out. My grades were awful, and then not good but getting better, until in my senior year I aced comprehensives and wrote an excellent senior thesis, graduating with high honors and a prize for most improvement from the Woodrow Wilson School, my major.</p>


<p>My senior thesis drew from a wide range of my reading as an undergraduate and from my experience during several summers working in a program called Swiss Holiday, run by the American School in Switzerland, then a small American-style boarding school starting up in Locarno, at the head of Logo Maggiore. My "work" had two sides, one teaching waterskiing, and the other, in tandem with another "adult" circa 18 to 20 or so, conducting 9 or 10 twelve-to-fourteen-year-olds on four 8-day long road trips, around Switzerland, Austria, northern Italy, and southern France in search of culture, adventure, and amusement.</p>
<p>My senior thesis drew from a wide range of my reading as an undergraduate and from my experience during several summers working in a program called Swiss Holiday, run by the American School in Switzerland, then a small American-style boarding school starting up in Locarno, at the head of Lago Maggiore. My "work" there had two sides, one teaching waterskiing, and the other, in tandem with another "adult" circa 18 to 20, conducting 9 twelve-to-fourteen-year-olds on four 8-day long road trips, around Switzerland, then Austria, southern France, and finally northern Italy, in all questng culture, adventure, and amusement. The experience had effects, as Goethe ssaid in Wilhelm's indenture, "he learns sportfully, seriousness comes on him by surprise." </p>


 
<p>At Columbia, I made the verb, <i>to study</i>, the means and goal of my career. I had left Princeton wanting to study the interaction between educatonal experience and the quality of cultural life for the better and the worse. I started at Columbia with no clear idea what that intent would entail or how I might fit it into the channels of expectation established there. After some missteps, I found my footing and my work moved on well both intelllectually and professionally.
At Columbia, I made the verb, to study, the means and goal of my career. With free rein from my dissertation sponsors, Lawrence A. Cremin and Jacques Barzun, I went all out on an intellectual biography of Ortega, defended in the spring of ‘68 in the midst of campus turmoil. It became a large, well-received first book, <i>Man and His Circumstances: Ortega as Educator</i>, published in 1971.</p>
 
 
<p>Perceiving dispersed parts of it, we form many partial views, diffusing its importance and novelty. Let's seek clarity about what the digital campus does, how it works, who it serves, where it flourishes, and why it is important.</i></p>
 
<p>To begin, consider <i>place</i>. A place interests us because it situates human experience, because of what happens, what <i>takes place</i> there. Place enables living interaction.
 
<p>At the fringe, there are exceptions, but it is fair to say that each college and university, and other educational institutions, has a campus, a physical place, buildings and grounds, which situates each institution and the people and activities that constitute it in space and time. Each particular campus differs from all the others, but they have common features and uses. If we have studied or worked at one campus, we will understand a good deal about how any one of the other ones function.</p>
 
<p>Physical arrangements enabling academic life to take place took elemental form in medevil cities 6 centuries ago, continuously developing since then.

Revision as of 12:27, 2 February 2025

On the digital campus

Hello,

I'm Robbie McClintock, a retired professor working to further the digital campus, an important emergent transformation in higher education. By digital campus, I'm not referring only to distance learning or to how campus courses use information technologies. It's situated at dot-edu, an emerging place in cyberspace, co-existing with the physical campus, where people engaging with an academic institution are becoming able to do all the activities they want and need to do. I'm working to advance that development because I believe it can become a transformative development for the betterment of all.

That purpose brings me to the business at hand: not to tell all that I think about the digital campus, but to say a bit about my experience that has led to my interest in it. I'm old, born 1939 in Manhattan, a child of depression yuppies — dad, investment banking, & mom, dress design. To the age of 3, I was a minor prince in Gramercy Park. Then I was moved, to my delight, to a small farm in eastern Pennsylvania, where I enjoyed a Rousseauian childhood. While my parents commuted to their work, I was looslely overseen with animals to tend, fences to mend, vegetables to grow, and a large wood to explore with a shallow stream in its middle leading home. At 8, youth began as the family together started to shuffle between farm and city, enabling me to shore up my formal education in elite schools — Buckley, Deerfield, Princeton (BA '61), and Columbia (PhD '68).

In retrospect, all that went quickly. As an only child of older parents, I spent much time alone among adults, acquiring an ease inspeaking with them, observant of both insights and imitations, forming my own views in a thoughtful reserve. I was cognizant of my own ignorance, and that of others, and without much alienation, I would fit in in many situations while rarely feeling a sense of belonging.

In school, I preferred sports to academics, doing just well enough on the scholastic escalator to keep advancing on the path I believed to be my choice. I had a strong sense of my ignorance and the curiosity that came with it. I was relatively adept at covering up what I did not know, and I advanced, not on grounds of achieved excellence, but thanks to perceptions of having strong promise. I didn't hold mastery of conventional learning in much esteem, wanting instead to tackle actual, intractable problems. As I matured, it came together in a knack for thinkin-out-of-the-box while finding a good place within the box.

Hence, through my formal education, I was poor at assigned learning, but ardent in self-directed study, in the classical sense — striving after, concentrating on, favoring, applying myself, giving attention to, being eager, zealous, taking pains, diligent, devoted to. With the bookstore as my curriculum, I studied my way through Princeton, sparked by avid reading in the work of the Spanish thinker, José Ortega y Gasset. At first, I flirted with flunking out. My grades were awful, and then not good but getting better, until in my senior year I aced comprehensives and wrote an excellent senior thesis, graduating with high honors and a prize for most improvement from the Woodrow Wilson School, my major.

My senior thesis drew from a wide range of my reading as an undergraduate and from my experience during several summers working in a program called Swiss Holiday, run by the American School in Switzerland, then a small American-style boarding school starting up in Locarno, at the head of Lago Maggiore. My "work" there had two sides, one teaching waterskiing, and the other, in tandem with another "adult" circa 18 to 20, conducting 9 twelve-to-fourteen-year-olds on four 8-day long road trips, around Switzerland, then Austria, southern France, and finally northern Italy, in all questng culture, adventure, and amusement. The experience had effects, as Goethe ssaid in Wilhelm's indenture, "he learns sportfully, seriousness comes on him by surprise."

At Columbia, I made the verb, to study, the means and goal of my career. I had left Princeton wanting to study the interaction between educatonal experience and the quality of cultural life for the better and the worse. I started at Columbia with no clear idea what that intent would entail or how I might fit it into the channels of expectation established there. After some missteps, I found my footing and my work moved on well both intelllectually and professionally.